13
Nov
2011
Why was going for two the wrong call?
By FCOadmin. Posted in The game situations | 1 Comment »So many reasons…so little time. OK maybe we have lots of time. OK here goes.
1994: Doak Campbell Stadium. Florida vs. Florida State
Florida once led this one 31-3. In the fourth quarter FSU mounts a furious comeback to close the game to 31-24. Late in the game they score another TD to make it 31-30 pending the extra point. There is no OT in these days. Bobby Bowden kicks the extra point and settles for a tie. The reason? Because he could not let his team come from behind like that and walk out of there with a loss. Hmm. Sounds a little like a team that was down by 7 with two minutes to play and had its back to the goal line against a team with a LouGroza Award candidate kicker doesn’t it?
1997: The Grove. UCF vs Ole Miss
UCF scores a last second TD to tie the game at 17 after they kick the extra point to send it into OT. Ole Miss gets the ball first in OT and scores a TD, kicks the extra point to make it 24-17. UCF scores a TD to make it 24-23 and Eugene McDowell decides to go for two. They call a QB draw. A hole opens up so big Culpepper could have walked in for the win. But on his way to sure victory, he trips over center and falls down. Ole Miss wins by a point. The moral of the story here? What was the point of kicking the extra point to send the game into OT only to go for two the first chance you get once you’re in OT?
Is there ever a circumstance where going for two in that situation is the right call?
Yes there is: 2007 Fiesta Bowl. Boise State vs. Oklahoma.
Boise State ties the game on a miracle play to send the game into OT. OU starts OT on offense and scores a TD rather easily. They kick the extra point to go up 7. Boise scores on their possession and calls a trick play on a two point conversion and wins the game. Why was this the right call you ask? Because OU has Boise overmatched physically. They are bigger, stronger, heavier and faster. If they keep playing overtimes all day, Boise will never stop them from scoring aTD. Eventually, OU will stop Boise. Boise knows this and decides to end this thing once and for all while they have the ball. Clearly UCF defense is not overmatched by Southern Miss’ offense.
There is no reason to believe that UCF would not be able to come up with a defensive stop in Overtime. In that entire game, Southern Miss scored only two touchdowns. They settled for field goals five times and the last time they were in the red zone, UCF forced a fumble. No reason to believe the defense could not have come up with a stop in OT.
IF going for two points in that situation is the right call, then why do so many college football games go into OT? IF ANY of you can show me that even 10% of coaches in that same situation opt to go for two instead of going into OT, I will shut down this site for good!


